Ukraine Needs State Policy on Grave International Crimes: ULAG at 2026 United for Justice and Dialogue Group Ministerial Meeting

On 7 May 2026, Kyiv hosted the 9th United for Justice — a high-level conference on international justice and accountability, this year focusing on accountability for crimes against civilians. The conference was held jointly with the third annual Ministerial Meeting of the Dialogue Group on Accountability for Ukraine, co-organised by the Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine and the Government of the Netherlands, bringing together national authorities, international institutions, civil society, and survivors to advance accountability for crimes committed during Russia's war against Ukraine.

The Ministerial Meeting focused on two thematic priorities: the harmonisation of domestic legislation with international standards, and the strategy for investigating and prosecuting international crimes. As a co-chair of Workstream 4 (Civil Society) of the Dialogue Group, ULAG contributed to the substantive preparation of the Meeting — including the joint Dialogue Group Recommendations agreed under the themes of the panels of the meeting.

During the second panel, Alina Pavliuk, ULAG's Legal Coordinator and Analyst, delivered remarks making the case for a coherent, state-level policy on justice and accountability for grave crimes.

The armed conflict, ongoing since 2014, has generated a staggering volume of documented violations. Ukraine must come up with an approach that would consolidate the efforts into a comprehensive system, rather than a set of fragmented processes. It should aim to comprehensively address the violations, including the widespread patterns and systemic violations, while preventing the system from being paralysed as a result of chasing each and every incident. 

Alina stressed that victims should be in the centre of the system, and their courage to pursue justice for crimes they have been subjected to must be duly acknowledged. Meaningful engagement with survivors that provides real space for their voices is imperative to ensure effective justice, but also one that would be responsive to victims’ needs. The shallower such engagement, the less likely they will continue showing up and participate, as practice since 2014 shows. 

Domestic authorities develop their own strategic vision, but institutional vision within each body is not enough. Sustained engagement from all stakeholders, not just the most motivated ones —, coherent communication across agencies, coordinated investigative strategies, shared priorities across all actors, as well as ensuring the necessary institutional and legislative framework to allow their work — all this requires a state-level commitment.

"Beyond the focus of individual institutions on which facts, crimes, and investigations matter most, we remain in a situation where the state itself must prioritise justice for the gravest international crimes." — Alina Pavliuk.

The need for a state policy was also brought up during the first panel on harmonization of Ukrainian legislation. Onysiia Syniuk from ZMINA Human Rights Centre stressed that issues related to crimes against humanity, support for victims, the prioritisation of proceedings and legislative reform cannot be addressed in isolation from one another. It needs a coordinated system and a clear understanding of a common goal.

Developing and adopting state policy on conflict-related international crimes would require significant work and even more importantly — strong political will. This makes it all the more significant that the idea was raised at a high-level event. Together with partners ULAG is working to develop a substantive vision that would hopefully help make this discussion more tangible.