We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies.
Customize Consent Preferences
We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Always Active
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
No cookies to display.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
No cookies to display.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
No cookies to display.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
No cookies to display.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
The report is a consolidated effort of a 5 year empirical research and analysis undertaken by the lawyers with international and domestic experience in representing victims of the armed conflict in Ukraine.
The report contains the results of a study on public attitudes towards international war crimes, assessment of the safety of war crimes witnesses, assistance to victims of war crimes, and overall access to and trust in national and international justice.
This analytical report examines Ukraine’s response to enforced disappearances in the context of armed conflict. The authors compare national legislation and practices with international standards, highlighting significant gaps in the protection of victims. The report offers recommendations for improving legal safeguards and ensuring accountability for these crimes.
This analytical report highlights the persecution, harassment, and systemic violations of the rights of Ukrainian lawyers working under Russian occupation in Crimea. Based on international standards, the document presents cases of repression, interference in legal practice, and instances of state-appointed lawyers collaborating with the occupying authorities.
This report explores the capacity of Ukraine’s judicial system to deliver fair justice for international crimes committed during Russia’s armed aggression. It presents insights from judges, veterans, and Ukrainian society, and highlights both challenges and opportunities in building an effective accountability mechanism.
This document contains information about individuals involved in the harassment and persecution of Ukrainian lawyers in occupied Crimea, as well as the creation of illegal Russian Bar associations there and the facilitation of the Russian Federation's illegal policy of colonizing the peninsula with its own citizens.
The document analyses the in absentia procedure in Ukraine, identifies problems in the legislation and proposes changes for its effective and fair application, especially in cases related to war crimes.
This analytical report assesses the use of the complementarity principle and offers recommendations to strengthen justice at the national and international levels.
This brochure discusses the use of in absentia proceedings within the national justice systems, particularly in the context of armed conflict, and focuses on the shortcomings in the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) of Ukraine.
This brochure offers comprehensive details on the crime of aggression within the framework of the International Criminal Court (ICC). It delves into the historical aspects of adopting the crime of aggression provisions, addressing the challenges of defining the crime and establishing the Court's jurisdiction.
This brochure outlines the two ways a state can accept the International Criminal Court's (ICC) jurisdiction: ratification or a declaration under Article 12(3) of the Rome Statute. It also details the differing rights and obligations associated with each method.
This document describes Ukraine's path to ratification of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), starting with Ukraine's signing of the Statute in 2000.
