US sanctions against the ICC jeopardise international justice for victims around the world, including Ukraine
Ukraine and other States Parties to the Rome Statute must defend the world's only legitimate permanent international tribunal.
On 21 November 2024, the Pre-Trial Chamber of the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu, Yoav Gallant, and Mohammed Deif.
The prospect of this decision has long been accompanied by threats to introduce sanctions against the Court by the United States. On 9 January 2025, the draft law H.R.23 - Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act was passed in the US House of Representatives. Its consideration in the Senate is expected in the coming days.
Arrest warrants are a natural stage of the international justice administration for the most serious international crimes, which must be comprehensively investigated and prosecuted. Influencing these processes through political instruments is unacceptable.
The imposition of sanctions, along with ongoing threats and regular attacks by various actors and states, will significantly undermine the work of the Court, including in relation to its investigation in Ukraine. It will also jeopardise the activities of organisations that support victims of the most serious crimes in Ukraine and interact with the ICC in any capacity. In this regard:
- We call on the US Senate and the administration of President-elect Trump not to adopt the Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act and not to impose sanctions against the ICC
We fully echo the Open Letter of the Washington Working Group on the ICC, which was co-signed by 75+ civil society organisations from around the world.
We would like to emphasise that the imposition of sanctions would nullify the achievements made in the framework of the unprecedented cooperation of the United States with the Court in the Ukraine investigation and risk depriving victims of international crimes of the hope of meaningful justice for the most serious perpetrators. - We call on Ukraine, as a state party to the Rome Statute, to proactively support and contribute to the strengthening of the ICC with respective actions. We believe that even in a current complex political context, representatives of the government and parliament have various tools and channels of interaction with partners that will help prevent and mitigate the risks faced by the Court.
This is not only an obligation under the Rome Statute, but is also clearly in the interests of the state, whose society (according to polls of the population and acting military personnel) and authorities place great hopes in the Courts as one of the important mechanisms for ensuring justice for grave crimes.
- We call on the members of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine to appeal to the newly elected representatives of the US Congress, many of whom have consistently supported Ukraine in the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes committed in the context of Russia's armed aggression.
- As a state party to the Rome Statute, Ukraine can also actively engage in efforts to develop policies and support systems within the ICC, together with representatives of the Court and other states. Civil society organisations are ready to facilitate such cooperation and contribute to the development of appropriate solutions.
- We call on the Ukrainian authorities to engage in active communication with the Court, member states and other relevant stakeholders in order to be properly informed about the possible consequences of the imposition of sanctions both for the ICC in general and for its work on Ukraine in particular.
- We call on the members of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine to appeal to the newly elected representatives of the US Congress, many of whom have consistently supported Ukraine in the fight against impunity for the most serious crimes committed in the context of Russia's armed aggression.
- We call on other States Parties to the Rome Statute to express their unconditional support for the ICC, to make efforts to prevent the imposition of sanctions, and to ensure sustainable funding and administrative capacity of the Court to reduce the potentially devastating consequences of possible sanctions. Operational stability and institutional resilience to various types of threats are key to the ICC's independence.
Signatories:
Ukrainian Legal Adviory Group
Center for Civil Liberties