The report, which ULAG contributed to both in its preparation and presentation, drew the Committee’s attention to systemic shortcomings in the investigation of torture in Ukraine, particularly in the context of the ongoing armed conflict.
At the closed civil society briefing, organisations highlighted a number of critical issues, including: the urgent need to harmonise the Criminal Code with international law, ensure the proper documentation of crimes (rather than the mere formal opening of criminal proceedings), improve the legal definition of torture, and strengthen judicial oversight of law enforcement actions. Our organisation was represented by Alina Pavliuk, ULAG’s legal analyst and coordinator of the network of lawyers.
The Committee expressed strong interest in conflict-related issues, reflecting a growing awareness of the human rights protection challenges Ukraine faces during wartime. Key topics discussed included the effectiveness of the judicial system, access to compensation, conditions in illegal detention facilities, compliance with the rights of prisoners of war, and mechanisms for investigating torture.
During the second session, in the round of follow-up questions to the Ukrainian government delegation, members of the Committee cited excerpts from the Alternative Report. These included concerns about the lack of reliable statistics on torture during the war, the qualification of torture under less serious criminal provisions, and the overall effectiveness of national justice processes. This indicates that civil society positions have been integrated into the international dialogue at the UN level.
The Committee will publish its concluding observations in the near future. The Ukrainian government will have one year to submit a response, and civil society organisations will be able to provide additional comments at the end of this period.
The Alternative Report was prepared by a coalition of organisations — ZMINA, Ukrainian Legal Advisory Group, Ukraine Without Torture, and FreeRights — with the support of the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT). The report focuses on the definition of torture, challenges in investigating such crimes and holding perpetrators accountable, conditions of detention, the role of national human rights institutions, key legal safeguards, and access to reparation and rehabilitation for victims. The ULAG team contributed to the section on documenting and investigating torture committed by Russia during the armed conflict.
The full report is available in both Ukrainian and English here:
https://zmina.ua/publication/alternatyvnyj-zvit-do-komitetu-oon-proty-katuvan-shhodo-vykonannya-ukrayinoyu-svoyih-mizhnarodnyh-zobovyazan-za-konvencziyeyu-proty-katuvan/
Read next
Articles
The voices of Ukrainians must be heard
The letter was published in May 2026 on the website of our long-time partner ECCHR, in the Living Open Archive section. It is a collection of personal impressions and stories from ECCHR staff and partners about the projects they work on, the injustices and contexts they experience, and the world they envision. They share intimate reflections in letters to their colleagues, allies, and the world.
Articles
Prisoners of War Tried as Terrorists: What Is Happening to Ukrainian Soldiers Captured in Russia’s Kursk Region
The number of Ukrainians captured by Russian forces in the Kursk region remains hidden by the fog of war and defenders may be considered missing in action for months before suddenly appearing in photographs posted on Telegram channels alongside other prisoners of war. Or, conversely, families may search those same channels every day for any trace of their loved one, only to one day receive the devastating news of their death.
Articles
ECtHR Case Law on the Consequences of the Armed Conflict in Ukraine: The Detention of Ukrainian Troops at the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant
At the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion, one of the primary objectives of the Russian armed forces was to seize control of the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant (ChNPP). In February 2022, Russian troops occupied the facility and detained everyone there, including both civilian personnel responsible for maintaining the operation of the plant and members of the National Guard of Ukraine (NGU), who were responsible for the facility’s security.
